It was obvious the police department was running an investigation that paralleled mine, the two interesecting at more than one point.
| —Sue Grafton, V is for Vengeance |
It was obvious the police department was running an investigation that paralleled mine, the two interesecting at more than one point.
| —Sue Grafton, V is for Vengeance |
Hey, just like the ship that made the Kessel Run in less than twelve parsecs.
Of course, I’m assuming you meant “mine,” not ‘mind’ – otherwise, if one assumes the mind is infinite, then I suppose they would indeed intersect (in the limit at infinity).
Sounds like the author is a bit clueless with geometric metaphors, but with luck she’ll turn that situation around 360 degrees.
Parallel lines meet at infinity.
All roads meet at Rome.
Crab meat at $30/lb.
Maybe they ran the same investigation? Then they would intersect at every point, no?
Cjohn: Typo corrected.
great circles on a sphere????
Logical Fallacy:
Fallacy of Ambiguity:
Equivocation: the same term is used with two different meanings.
From dictionary.com…
par·al·lel
[par-uh-lel, -luhl] Show IPA adjective, noun, verb, par·al·leled, par·al·lel·ing or ( especially British ) par·al·lelled, par·al·lel·ling.
adjective
1. extending in the same direction, equidistant at all points, and never converging or diverging: parallel rows of trees.
2. having the same direction, course, nature, or tendency; corresponding; similar; analogous: Canada and the U.S. have many parallel economic interests.
Next!
I thought it would be clever to suggest that she was just being hyperbolic.
Turns out hyperbolic geometry doesn’t work quite the way I thought, though.
She has a parabolic style. I prefer Chandler; he’s elliptical.
i didnt make it past g is for gumshoe.
on a math note, what if the lines are identical? arent they also parallel?
“i didnt make it past g is for gumshoe.”
The only one I ever tried was B is For Boring
I bet that both investigations were broadly focussed too.
I thought A is for Asymptote would never end.
The police Dept exists in non-Euclidean space.
Investigations rarely run in straight lines.
Amusing, though.
I know parallel lines can intersect once (on the surface of a sphere). There’s that parallel postulate again.
But is there a surface where parallel lines can intersect multiple times?
Parallel lines on a donut can intersect an infinite number of times.
Hmm, do you have a picture? I’m having a hard time visualizing that
The linguistic problem is called “metaphor overload.”
Besides, “locally parallel” curves can intersect when prolonged beyond the “locality.” Think of meridians of longitude on a sphere … they’re locally parallel near the equator.
Bill Drissel
Grand Prairie, TX
“Parallel lines on a donut can intersect an infinite number of times.”
That’s hard to swallow – it will take me a while to digest it.
I don’t see why this line is objectionable…isn’t the only thing that’s impossible is for two parallel lines to cross at a single point?
donuts at a police department? this investigation has come full circle.
interesecting => intersecting
:)
SL: “… that paralleled mine, the two interesecting at more
than one point.”
From a recent newpaper column recipe, SF Chronicle,
for cucumber salad: “Cut the whole cucumber in half
crosswise, so that you have three equal pieces.”
well, as any 6th grader can tell you, fractions are heck -