Some recent reviews of
The Big Questions:
To read the comments on a post, or to add a comment, you can click on the title of that post.
Search:
-------------------------------------------------------------
Recent Posts
- I Too Have Riddled Boxcars Boxcars Boxcars
- About That Boxcar
- Boxcar Willie
- News From The Math World
- What’s a Bitcoin Worth? (Wonkish)
- Seven Trees in One
- To Hold You Over….
- A Sip of Monstrous Moonshine
- Terror, Truth and Torture
- A Dog Who Really Wants A Cat
- I GIve Up
- Cats, Dogs and Coin Flips
- Another Rationality Test
- ‘Bam’nesty
- Friedman on Psychic Harm
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009

It always irks me when someone is willing to call something “sophistry” without feeling the need to actually present a real counter-argument. I’m still waiting to get the book for Christmas, but I assume that the headache argument is along the lines of pointing out that there’s something deeply inconsistent with refusing to pay 1$ to prevent a 1-in-a-billion chance of death, paying 1$ to cure a headache, but not paying a life to cure a billion headaches.
Maybe there is a good answer to that seemingly inconsistency, but it DEMANDS a good answer, not a flip refutation that boils down into merely a restatement of one of the prongs of the original inconsistency (i.e. the presumed idea that no one would kill anyone for any price whatsoever)
Getting a copy for Xmas. Surprised that none of the L.A. libraries have picked this one up.
And while your argument against libraries in Fair Play is exactly the reason it’s a good library book to me, this one definitely sounds like a keeper.